Being registered with many poker sites has its benefits and its disadvantages. With a huge option of games to play, different bonuses and competitions, I could be online 24/7 and always find a game to play, major tournament to qualify for (Ha! Ha!) and try to higher my standard. The downside is that I get a stack of junk email.
Some of these communications ask me to part with $20 upwards to invest in commit to a book that will revolutionize the way I play on the tables and pledging me riches beyond my wildest dreams. Headlines such as "Invest in the Whacky System" inform me that, for a small outlay, I will get the innermost secrets of professional poker players. In reality, these are all training courses which are broadly free online and bear most of the knowledge that one gets from simply playing - "When a man with money meets a man with experience, the man with experience leaves with money and the man with money leaves with experience." Anon.
Nonetheless, after a little investigation, I though I would try one out. One of these companies (who I will not grace by advertising their name) declares that you bet a "reasonable" amount when holding pocket pairs TT or higher, AJ, AQ or AK, and when holding suited connectors (5d 6d for instance). The "reasonable" amount was a bit unclear and this hardly represented advanced hand selection. But I carried on, deciding that I would bet the pot rather than go all in every hand and see how it went. Three SnGs later, this is what took place
Game 1 started with AA in mid-position. Was this a omen that I had chosen the right direction for my future poker play? I bet the pot. The flop came down, I was raised and bet the pot, which was re-raised and 4 us ended up all in. An A on the turn and I collected. Thank you system. Would I have got such a catch if I had gone all in at the beginning? Hmm? So, I carried on only betting on cards that fell into my criteria and folding everything else. The hands in which I was not playing provided a useful time to examine my opponents and the way they played. Who was aggressive. Who was passive. How table position affected the way that some people played and not others. I felt that I should be doing this more religiously, so in one respect it was time well utilized.
After 30 minutes, just three players remained. Some of my bets had won, some caused the table to fold and I just gathered the blinds. Then I hit AA again and lost to two pairs. The next hand I was out when, following the system, I ended up all in on 3s 4s. Third place and an education - not bad, although I would have got at least third place, I felt, with the cards I had been dealt.
Game 2 was all over in two hands. 3d 4d, followed by 6d 7d
In game 3, I did not obtain the cards to play a hand for the first 20 minutes, by which time four players had already departed and I was sitting 3 of 5. More time to learn about my opposition. I got AK, was raised to all in and picked up with two pairs. Several hands later, I am sitting 3 of 3 after my raises brought folds from my opponents and two had knocked themselves out. My stats at this point were; played 5 of 32, won 1 hand at showdown and 4 without.
The chip leader took out the third player, and we were heads up. I kept on playing to the system and he completely "sussed" what I was doing (if, in fact, he didn't know already). There would have been an eventual situation where I would have ended second as he was folding to any raise I made and I was folding any cards that did not adhere to the system. The blinds would have wiped me out ultimately. So, I abandoned the system, played my day-after-day game and won.
My conclusion is that systems don't work solely. You have to incorporate them into your regular strategies. Combining a system with luck will enable you to pick up a few runner up rewards but, is that what you really want? - 31897
Some of these communications ask me to part with $20 upwards to invest in commit to a book that will revolutionize the way I play on the tables and pledging me riches beyond my wildest dreams. Headlines such as "Invest in the Whacky System" inform me that, for a small outlay, I will get the innermost secrets of professional poker players. In reality, these are all training courses which are broadly free online and bear most of the knowledge that one gets from simply playing - "When a man with money meets a man with experience, the man with experience leaves with money and the man with money leaves with experience." Anon.
Nonetheless, after a little investigation, I though I would try one out. One of these companies (who I will not grace by advertising their name) declares that you bet a "reasonable" amount when holding pocket pairs TT or higher, AJ, AQ or AK, and when holding suited connectors (5d 6d for instance). The "reasonable" amount was a bit unclear and this hardly represented advanced hand selection. But I carried on, deciding that I would bet the pot rather than go all in every hand and see how it went. Three SnGs later, this is what took place
Game 1 started with AA in mid-position. Was this a omen that I had chosen the right direction for my future poker play? I bet the pot. The flop came down, I was raised and bet the pot, which was re-raised and 4 us ended up all in. An A on the turn and I collected. Thank you system. Would I have got such a catch if I had gone all in at the beginning? Hmm? So, I carried on only betting on cards that fell into my criteria and folding everything else. The hands in which I was not playing provided a useful time to examine my opponents and the way they played. Who was aggressive. Who was passive. How table position affected the way that some people played and not others. I felt that I should be doing this more religiously, so in one respect it was time well utilized.
After 30 minutes, just three players remained. Some of my bets had won, some caused the table to fold and I just gathered the blinds. Then I hit AA again and lost to two pairs. The next hand I was out when, following the system, I ended up all in on 3s 4s. Third place and an education - not bad, although I would have got at least third place, I felt, with the cards I had been dealt.
Game 2 was all over in two hands. 3d 4d, followed by 6d 7d
In game 3, I did not obtain the cards to play a hand for the first 20 minutes, by which time four players had already departed and I was sitting 3 of 5. More time to learn about my opposition. I got AK, was raised to all in and picked up with two pairs. Several hands later, I am sitting 3 of 3 after my raises brought folds from my opponents and two had knocked themselves out. My stats at this point were; played 5 of 32, won 1 hand at showdown and 4 without.
The chip leader took out the third player, and we were heads up. I kept on playing to the system and he completely "sussed" what I was doing (if, in fact, he didn't know already). There would have been an eventual situation where I would have ended second as he was folding to any raise I made and I was folding any cards that did not adhere to the system. The blinds would have wiped me out ultimately. So, I abandoned the system, played my day-after-day game and won.
My conclusion is that systems don't work solely. You have to incorporate them into your regular strategies. Combining a system with luck will enable you to pick up a few runner up rewards but, is that what you really want? - 31897
About the Author:
For more articles and information on Poker and Poker Rooms visit our website Omaha Hi.
